[Gmsh] Wrong definition of a volume

[Alexis Blasselle]

Thank you very much, it works perfectly !

Have a nice day.

Best regards,

alexis

Le 23 mars 2010 14:05, demesy <guillaume.demesy at fresnel.fr> a écrit :

> Hi Alexis,
>
> I'm not quite sure to understand what you're trying to do.
>
> the attached .geo seems to work. You can scale the whole mesh afterwards.
>
> Best,
>
> Guillaume
>
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:36:05 +0100, Alexis Blasselle <
> alexis.blasselle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I can not understand why the volume(1) in the attached filed is not the one
> I am expecting to define:
> it should be the union of the three extruded quarter of circle and of the
> part of the ball.
>
> When commenting the current surface(1) and uncommenting all the other
> things, everything is ok.
>
> Maybe it is because of an orientation problem, but I've checked twice, and
> this does not explain that doing the union of the four volumes works
> perfectly.
>
> I thank you for all your great work, and thank you in advance for your
> answers,
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
> --
> http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/~blasselle/<http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/%7Eblasselle/>
>
>


-- 
http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/~blasselle/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20100323/6aa718bb/attachment.html>