[Gmsh] Wrong definition of a volume
alexis.blasselle at gmail.com
Tue Mar 23 14:18:00 CET 2010
Thank you very much, it works perfectly !
Have a nice day.
Le 23 mars 2010 14:05, demesy <guillaume.demesy at fresnel.fr> a écrit :
> Hi Alexis,
> I'm not quite sure to understand what you're trying to do.
> the attached .geo seems to work. You can scale the whole mesh afterwards.
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:36:05 +0100, Alexis Blasselle <
> alexis.blasselle at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> I can not understand why the volume(1) in the attached filed is not the one
> I am expecting to define:
> it should be the union of the three extruded quarter of circle and of the
> part of the ball.
> When commenting the current surface(1) and uncommenting all the other
> things, everything is ok.
> Maybe it is because of an orientation problem, but I've checked twice, and
> this does not explain that doing the union of the four volumes works
> I thank you for all your great work, and thank you in advance for your
> Best regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gmsh