[Gmsh] R: R: Gmsh .msh file
Alessandro Vicini
alessandro.vicini at sitael.com
Thu Jun 29 12:23:33 CEST 2017
But if I get it right:
1) if I define physical entities and export the mesh without checking "save all" I will not have internal faces;
2) if I check "save all" I loose the physical entities definition.
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Jeremy Theler [mailto:jeremy at seamplex.com]
Inviato: giovedì 29 giugno 2017 11:53
A: Alessandro Vicini; gmsh at onelab.info
Oggetto: Re: R: [Gmsh] Gmsh .msh file
define one (or more) physical volumes
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 09:22 +0000, Alessandro Vicini wrote:
> Yes, the problem is that I would like to have physical entities
> defined, but also the connectivity of all internal faces (possibly
> without duplications...).
>
> A.
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: gmsh [mailto:gmsh-bounces at ace20.montefiore.ulg.ac.be] Per conto di
> Jeremy Theler
> Inviato: giovedì 29 giugno 2017 11:17
> A: gmsh at onelab.info
> Oggetto: Re: [Gmsh] Gmsh .msh file
>
> See
>
> http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Elementary-vs-physical-entitie
> s
>
> As much as I would like to say RTFM, I have to say that this has
> happened to me when I started using gmsh and I believe it happened to
> many other users.
>
> I wonder if there exist a more intuitive way of dealing the
> Mesh.SaveAll option.
>
> --
> jeremy
> www.seamplex.com
>
>
> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 08:46 +0000, Alessandro Vicini wrote:
> > Hullo,
> >
> > the elements which are printed out in the msh file are the boundary
> > faces and the tetrahedral.
> > Is there some way to have also the connectivity of all internal
> > faces?
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Alessandro
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmsh mailing list
> > gmsh at onelab.info
> > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh at onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
More information about the gmsh
mailing list