[Gmsh] Forcing Consistent Mesh Sizes At Common Boundaries 3/11/13

[Christophe Geuzaine]

Hi Gary - The common line is duplicated in your geometry, hence the independent meshes. Use a single line and you will be all set:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TwoBodyGmsh.geo
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20130312/de5f3d62/attachment.geo>
-------------- next part --------------


On 11 Mar 2013, at 23:14, "Williams, Gary" <gary.williams2 at aerojet.com> wrote:

> Hello:
>  
> I want to be able to control the mesh size/distribution at a common boundary.
>  
> Included is a simple two block configuration where I have tried to accomplish that unsuccessfully.
>  
> I?d like to be able to control the mesh size and distribution at the common interface.  In this case its between NODES 4 & 6 or at LINE 8.
>  
>  
> <image001.jpg>
>  
> I recognize that I could divide the larger block into two smaller blocks but would like to approach this problem using the GMSH features if possible.
>  
> It appears that might be accomplished with the ?periodic line? option, but I don?t know how to implement.
>  
> I am hoping that one of the more experienced users can look at the file and  image and provide directions as to how to accomplish this.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> gsw
> <TwoBodyGmsh.geo><TwoBodyGmsh.png>_______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh at geuz.org
> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

-- 
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine