[Gmsh] Incorrect display of physical group name whose id is shared with another group of different dimension

[Christophe Geuzaine]

On 24/11/09 12:13, Takuya OSHIMA wrote:
> I sent the following mail yesterday but seems to have been lost. Sorry
> if this is (will be) a duplicate (p.s. thanks for the fix about the
> format version problem).
>
> Hi,
>
> 1. Please find and gunzip the attached Mesh_1.med.gz. The mesh has
>     physical groups Surface_1 and Surface_2 for the surface elements
>     with IDs 1 and 2, and Volume_1 for the entire volume with ID 1. I
>     am not so familiar with the MED format, but that's what I see in
>     the physical name definitions when it is converted to the Gmsh
>     format.
> 2. Start gmsh, open Mesh_1.med
> 3. Tools->Visibility
> 4. Choose Physical groups at the bottom of the List browser tab
>
> Then you will see the entity Number 1 of Type Surface is listed as
> Volume_1, which in fact should be Surface_1. On the contrary, if you
> move to the Tree browser tab you will see Physical Surface 1 is named
> as Surface_1 as expected.
>
> Tested with Gmsh 2.4.2 and 2.4.3-svn as of today on Linux.

Indeed, it's a small bug in the list view (the tree view is OK). We will 
fix it asap.


>
> Regards,
> Takuya
>
> Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
> Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh at geuz.org
> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh


-- 
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine