[Gmsh] MeshFormat Version number
Rui Maciel
rui.maciel at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 15:55:59 CEST 2009
Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> Exactly: it's a very small change, only affecting the optional
> $PhysicalNames/$EndPhysicalNames section.
>
> The problem was that with version 2, we did not save a dimension (0D,
> 1D, 2D or 3D) together with the name. Hence we could not guarantee a
> one-to-one mapping between physical names and physical numbers. Indeed,
> physical numbers need only to be unique per dimension (you can have
> Physical Point(1) and Physical Line(1)).
In that case is the definition of the new document format version still open to
suggestions?
Rui Maciel