[Gmsh] mesh problem on a cylinder

[Teresa Pinheiro]

Thank you very much for your quick solution of the problem!

Now it is possible to obtain a 3D mesh of the reported structures. Indeed, I
have been able to obtain only a very dense 3D mesh, considering a very small
element size factor. In case a not so small value of this parameter is
considered, it's possible to obtain a 2D mesh, but not a 3D mesh. Is this a
requirement for the 3D mesh in this kind of structures or would there be any
other alternative in order to get a not so dense mesh?

Again, thank you for your help!

Teresa

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be>wrote:

> Teresa Pinheiro wrote:
>
>> Hello to everybody!
>>
>> I have found two simple examples with cylindric symmetry, where the mesh
>> module of gmsh doesn't perform a 3D mesh. I have tried with different
>> meshing algorithms and changing the element size factor, but I haven't been
>> able to obtain a 3D mesh.
>>
>>
> Hi Teresa - this should be fixed in tomorrow's nightly snapshot: there
> was a small tolerance issue in the mesh algorithm for periodic surfaces.
>
> Thanks for the bug report!
>
> Christophe
>
>
>  See the brep files, where the geometry is kept and the output files, where
>> the outgoing info is saved.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Teresa
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmsh mailing list
>> gmsh at geuz.org
>> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>>
>
>
> --
> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine<http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/%7Egeuzaine>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20090511/b9a577fc/attachment.html>