[Gmsh] meshing differences between version 1.65.0 and 2.0.4

[Daniel Wheeler]

On Mar 21, 2007, at 11:47 AM, David Colignon wrote:

>
>
> Daniel Wheeler wrote:
>> Thanks for the prompt reply.
>> On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:09 PM, David Colignon wrote:
>>>
>> I am trying to create a tapered mesh from a fine to a coarse  
>> region. If I want one edge to have only one or two elements then the
>> rectangle must have a length that is 10 times greater than the  
>> width. Is that correct?
>
> Yes, but I suppose it is not a good solution for you
>
> You can also ad an isolated point
> Point(999) = { 10 , 10 , 10 , spacing } ;
> to artificially increase the size of the bounding box and get rid  
> of this limitation.

Hadn't thought of that. That is a good solution for now. Thanks.

>>>
>> Not an option. The code is distributed to others. Could the  
>> divisor be made a parameter that is passed?
>
>
> It could be... We are still looking for better solutions to this  
> problem

> Cheers,
>
> Dave

--
Daniel Wheeler


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20070321/66a7731b/attachment.html>