[Gmsh] Again the normals ..

[Nacho Andres de la Fuente]

Dear Christophe,

My excuses, I did not realize that when associating all the previous
physical surfaces I was again defining them wrong again, and thus the
double definition, so it works fine the way you explined it. Many thanks
anyway.

Kind REgards,
Nacho

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 20:54, Nacho Andres de la Fuente wrote:
> Dear Cristophe,
> 
> First of all, thanks a lot in advance for your invaluable knowledge and
> you infinite patiente ... After flattering .. another boring question ..
> 
> I am having problems with the normals .. I already checked the list for
> these kind of problems and I first generated the mesh file, saved it,
> opened it again and in case that the directions of the normals were not
> correct I changed the signs into the Phys. Surf. and that should be it,
> am I correct? When I follow this procedure (with gmsh 1.50) I get
> surfaces with normals defined in both directions .. the initial one and
> the  reversed one (and I must point out that I am generating a
> completely new msh file each time). Could you give me a hint about how
> to solve this?
> 
> Thx
> Nacho  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh at geuz.org
> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh