<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14px;">It seems this question has been asked by Daniel on Sun Jan 17 20:47:48 CET 2010 and answered by Patrick on Tue Feb 9 16:51:09 CET 2010. Thank you Patrick.</span></font><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14px;">John</span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Times"><i><br></i></font><div><div>On Feb 19, 2011, at 2:48 PM, John Phillips wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Attached is a simplified model of a thick film resistor using a 2d mesh. Instead of applying the boundary conditions as voltage at the two terminals (as shown in the attached files), is it possible to use mixed boundary conditions, like voltage at the negative terminal, and either current, or current density at the positive terminal?<br><br>Thanks for your help.<br><br>John<br><br><span><2d_Resistor.geo></span><br><span><2d_Resistor.pro></span><br><span><Integration.pro></span><br><span><Jacobian.pro></span>_______________________________________________<br>getdp mailing list<br><a href="mailto:getdp@geuz.org">getdp@geuz.org</a><br>http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/getdp<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>